Sunday, May 7, 2017

Technology Proposal Paper: Roving Reference


Technology Proposal: Roving Reference Services

Introduction:

              Roving reference is not an entirely new topic or technology trend, as it has been implemented in various forms over the last decade or so. Roving Reference as defined by LIS Wiki (2014), is reference services provided away from the traditional reference or service desk. This is to make it easier for staff to provide reference services to patrons, without them having to approach the service desk.
Roving Reference tools can consist of either a mobile device such as a tablet or smartphone or a laptop that is connected to the library’s integrated library system with access to the catalog and patron records. This set-up is either used in conjunction with the service desk or on its own, where in this case there is no service desk and staff is equipped with either a mobile device or laptop with a hand-held scanner and they provide service to library patrons within the library stacks or out on the floor.
              I would like to recommend that the Atlanta-Fulton Public Library System (AFPLS) consider adopting and implementing the Roving Reference approach on a smaller scale by supplementing the service desk with Roving Reference Services. At the moment, the library system is renovating its older branches and has completed the construction of 8 new library branches and 2 remodeled branches, as a part of $275 million bond referendum passed in 2008; this bond referendum also provides funding to renovate the remaining branches over the course of two to three years (afpls.org, 2017). Adding this new service will be reflected on the library system’s approach to a more modern appearance for all its libraries and improve the customer service experience for their patrons.
              Currently, the set-up at all AFPLS library branches involves a traditional service desk that patrons have to approach with any questions or service requests. Smaller branches usually have one desk to assist patrons with circulation and reference services while larger branches have as many as three desks for circulation, reference and children’s services.

Literature Review:
              Current literature does suggest that many public libraries are moving towards a more patron centered approach to providing services and one of the popular changes is implementing some form of Roving Reference Services. It does appear that there is a general approval of Roving Reference suggested in the literature and there appear to be more advantages than disadvantages
              Nunn and Ruane (2012), express the importance of properly marketing library resources and services to patrons by using a patron centered approach to provide reference services, promote and draw awareness to library resources and services. They further state that addressing individual user needs by providing personalized reference services is essential to highlight library services (Nunn & Ruane, 2012).
              According to his article in Library Journal, Enis (2015), states that modern technology has made the use of tablets for Roving References Services much easier and more affordable. He mentions some ILS vendors such as SirsiDynix who have launched interfaces that support the use of mobile devices for a variety of tasks from staff duties to reference services for library patrons (Enis, 2015).
              The main purpose of libraries, is to provide service to their patrons and communities, and to determine how to meet the service needs of their users. O’Gorman and Trott (2009) mention that the library faces competition with online search engines to provide references service which has prompted a need for libraries to evaluate the reference services and adopt new ideas and models to help keep their reference services relevant (O’Gorman & Trott, 2009).

Application:
              With current technology trends, roving reference is definitely a great way to use current technology to reach out to more library users and interact with them, outside of the traditional service desk. I think that in addition to the service desk, roving reference would help the library extend service to more people. A one-on-one approach out on the floor or among the library stacks creates a more personable atmosphere where patrons feel as though their concerns or requests are being heard, and they are not being rushed or do not feel as though they are holding up the line or taking up too much of the staff person’s time.
              Also, Roving Reference Services can be used to promote new library databases and e-resources; while assisting patrons out on the floor, staff can also engage patrons further by showing them library resources and databases on a mobile device and demonstrating how these databases work on such devices. At the moment, staff is limited to demonstrating how databases operate by either using computers or by using patrons’ mobile devices, and so that could be a great way to highlight the library’s electronic collection by using a mobile device in conjunction with the traditional desktop computers.
              Lastly, the Roving Reference tools can be used by staff to undertake various projects during down times or before the library opens. The roving reference tools are portable and so staff can use them among the stacks for weeding projects, to actively search for items for displays, and they can be used to generate electronic library reports of items marked missing or lost in the catalog, items that patrons claim to have returned, or items that are in transit to various library branches but may be shelved by mistake. These electronic reports can be run by the devices and do not have to be printed, and staff can search the shelves for these items without having to leave the stacks to scan items. It can also be used for general shelf reading and used identify material that are out of place on the shelves, including materials that are still charged out to patrons.

Challenges:
              One of the main challenges to implementing this service is funding; with ongoing renovations and a strained budget, it might be a daunting task for the library to implement at the moment. However, funding for the Roving Reference project can be obtained through a grant and it can be scaled down significantly. I would suggest an initial quantity of about five to ten kits containing a WI-FI enabled tablet with a case and attachment keyboard, and wireless mini blue tooth scanner, and their charging cables. Each kit can be used by the various branches and the results from each branch can be evaluated and that can be the determining factor for purchasing larger quantities and implementing it on a larger scale.
               Another challenge is training, while many staff members may be comfortable handling and using mobile devices to provide services to patrons and are able to use them confidently, not all staff members may be comfortable or confident with using mobile devices to provide service. The goal is to provide adequate training to equip staff with enough knowledge and resources to be able to operate and use the devices confidently and comfortably but that may not always be the case. Ultimately, I would suggest that staff should not be obligated to use or perform roving reference services if they do not feel confident or comfortable enough to do so.
               Lastly, another challenge would be equipment maintenance and troubleshooting, it is my hope that if this proposal comes to fruition, that there will be detailed instructions on how to properly use and maintain the equipment, and reiterate that the devices are intended for library-related work and must be used as such. Troubleshooting instructions and maintenance schedules can be planned and the devices can be equipped with instructions on what to do if any issues arise while they are in use by staff.

Conclusion:
              Finally, current technology trends are always changing and adapting and many libraries have learned to adapt with each technology trend, Roving Reference has been implemented in varying ways over the last few years, and I think that it would be to the advantage of the Atlanta-Fulton Public Library System to use this technology to their advantage.  Current literature review shows Roving Reference Services in a favorable light, and there appear to be more advantages to using it than disadvantages.
              For this proposal, I did not include specifics on what type of tablet or operating system, because that will depend on the IT Department for the county, but their recommendation will be based on funds available, and what types of devices will work best with the library system’s Integrated Library System (ILS) and require minimal maintenance and troubleshooting.
               In conclusion, implementing Roving Reference Services will be a great way to help AFPLS enhance their current services, and provide a better experience for their patrons. The Roving Reference tools will not only benefit patrons but staff as well, as it can be helpful to improve their workflow significantly.




References
AFPLS. (2017). Building for the Future. Retrieved May 03, 2017, from http://www.afpls.org/building-for-the-future
Ennis, M. (2015). Meet the Tabletarians. Library Journal,140(1), 39-40. Retrieved May 03, 2017, from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2015/01/technology/meet-the-tabletarians-mobile-services/#_
LISWiki. (2014, May). Roving reference. Retrieved May 03, 2017, from  https://liswiki.org/wiki/Roving_reference
Nunn, B., & Ruane, E. (2012). Marketing Gets Personal: Promoting Reference Staff to Reach Users. Journal of Library Administration,52(6-7), 571-580.
O'Gorman, J., & Trott, B. (2009). What Will Become of Reference in Academic and Public Libraries?. Journal Of Library Administration49(4), 327-339. 





No comments:

Post a Comment